History Book

Alexander's Attack on Iran

 
History Book

Alexander's Attack on India

 
History Book

Analysis and Conclusion


 

Unveiling the Truth: Alexander's Encounters in Ancient India


Although I know that Alexander and his army did not go eastward from Khuzestan and returned from there, I will still review the writings of the Alexander letters regarding Alexander and his army's journey to Gorgan, Khorasan, present-day Afghanistan, Transoxiana (Mawarannahr), Western India (Pakistan), Baluchistan, Kerman, and Fars, to leave no dark or unexamined area.

The Alexander writers, for five years (from 330 to 325 BCE), have unified Alexander and his army with the lands of Gorgan, Khorasan, Transoxiana (Mawarannahr), Herat, Sistan, Rakhj (modern-day Kandahar), Kabul, Balkh, Lahore, Karachi, Baluchistan, and more, to turn the "legend of Alexander" into a historical event.
The Alexander writers and scholars did not believe that one day there would be people in these lands who would catch them in the act and reveal their tricks. The names of the cities in the regions of Gorgan, Khorasan, Transoxiana (Mawarannahr), present-day Afghanistan, Western India, and Baluchistan are ancient names, and most of them are natural names, not named by anyone. For example, let me mention a few of these names:
Astaraabad, which was mistakenly named Gorgan, is composed of two parts: Astara + Abad. Astara means fire or a bright place, like: Khaakastar (meaning ash soil), Shabastar (meaning fire of the night). Astara and Setareh (star) are the same word.
Astara, a Jewish girl whose tomb is said to be in Hamadan, was a star of the harem, and her name is Iranian, not Hebrew. Stern (German), Star (English), and Stella (Italian) are derived from the Iranian Astara or Setareh. Abad is a shortened form of "Ab Bood Aad", meaning it is a place with water. The Sadd-e-Iskander in Gorgan, which is called Sedd-e-Qezel Ala in Turkmen, is a large water canal for the Gorgan plain.
Quchan, Kuchan is the great city of the Kuchis who ruled there for a long time. Ashkabus also came from the Kuch tribe. The Kuchis migrated from here to the Kuch plain in eastern Afghanistan and Baluchistan. In Iranian Baluchistan, Kuch is synonymous with Baluch.
Ebrshahr (modern-day Nishapur) was one of the three major cities of Greater Khorasan (the other two were Herat and Merv). Ebr is the same as the German word Uber and the English word Over, indicating that it is a very ancient word, possibly representing a major city of ancient times.
Tus means a warm place (Teh = warm + Os = place) and is a very ancient name. Teh = Tef = To = Tab = Tabe means warm, as in Tâbestân (summer), Tab (fever), and so on. Os means a stony place.
Sanabad (modern-day Mashhad) is composed of Sine (meaning Hawk) + Abad (meaning settlement). Sine is a very ancient word that also appears in other place names, such as: Sanandaj (Sine = Hawk + Dej = Fortress), meaning Hawk Fortress. Sahneh = Sine, Sink, Farsink, Sa'in-Qaleh (Sa'in = Sine = Hawk + Qaleh which became Arabic as Kalleh) means Hawk Fortress and others.
Zabol, composed of three parts: Zah (a narrow line) + Ab (water) + Bal (abundant). Zabol means Zah (narrow line) of abundant water.
Kabul is made up of three parts: Kuh (mountain) + Ab (water) + Bal (abundant). Kabul means Mountain with abundant water.
Markand (Mar = Serpent + Kand, derived from the root Kandan, meaning digging). It is a small village in the Qareh Ziya al-Din section of northwestern Azerbaijan. The word Mar is more common in Azerbaijan place names, such as: Maragheh (Mar = Medes + Ragheh = garden on a mountain slope), Marand (Mar = Medes + And = low), Marivan (Mar = Medes + Iwan = a type of structure). So this name should be in Azerbaijan, not in Transoxiana (Mawarannahr).
Kand comes from the root word Kandan. After the arrival of the Aryans to the Iranian plateau, they used to dig the earth and live there, as they did in ancient times. Over time, Kand became the name of towns and villages, like: Samar Kand (Samarkand), Kho Kand (Khukand), Tashkend. The words Kandak (ditch), Kandeh (small trench), Khand (house) are derived from Kandan.
The Scythians of Iran – I show the locations of the Scythians and the Scythian people in four places in modern Iran: one in Sistan, which is a shortened form of Sikstan or Skistan. Rostam Zaboli was one of the Scythians of Sistan. The second location is Sangsar or Seksar, which has been mispronounced as "Sag Sar" and translated as Ras al-Kab. To avoid reading it as Sk, they added an "n" and called it Sangsar.
The Sogund clan in Lorestan are Skvand or Scythians. The fourth place is in the large settlement of Sakzi in the Kuhpayeh region of Esfahan, on the way to Nayin. Additionally, in Khoyin, a large village 60 km southwest of Zanjan, people of Dailami and Sistani descent live. Their language is an ancient Iranian mix of Dailami and Sistani. Near Khoyin, an underground passage has been dug that dates back to ancient times. It is believed to be a fire temple post where the ancestors of the Khoyini people were stationed to protect Dailam and Sistan. In the Qazvin plain, there is also a place called Segzabad.
Ardakan: In modern-day Iran, there are two places named Ardakan: one in the northwestern part of Shiraz, on the road from Shiraz to Khuzestan and the way from Behbahan to Ramgerd, where Alexander and his army camped near the resistance of the people of Khuzestan; and another Ardakan in northwestern Yazd, on the road from Nayin to Yazd.
Mamasani, which should be the same as the "Mamsan" of the Alexander letters. One of the valiant tribes of the people of Khuzestan are the Mamasani. Mamsan or Mamsan means the great of the greats (Mah = great + Maseen = great ones). Mas means great, as in Mister (greater) and is similar to the word Mahtir in soldier houses, meaning a superior. In German, Meister = teacher, in English Master, in Italian Maestro = teacher, and in French, Maitre has the same meaning. The word also has an accent (´) in French to indicate the dropping of the "S".
Khoryan is a village located in the southwest of Shahrud and an agricultural region in the southeast of Semnan, known primarily for its oil reserves, which fell under Russian control. According to the Alexander historians, they report that Alexander was in the vicinity of Damghan in July 330 BC, near the body of Darius III, and then took him to the city of "100 Gates" before heading to Gorgan. The location of the city of "100 Gates" has been identified in the southwest of Damghan. During the construction of the Khorasan Railway in the years 1317–18, railway engineers extensively searched for the mythical city of 100 Gates mentioned by the Alexander historians, but found no trace of it. No such place existed near Damghan, and it was a creation of the Alexander historians.
The Alexander historians claim that after Alexander had settled matters in Sistan, he moved towards "Arya Sep" and then directed him towards Arachosiens (Rakhj?) and from there to Parapamisad, which was said to be a wild land covered in thick snow and ice, with no beasts, birds, or any form of life. The Alexander historians provided the following geographical details for "Parapamisad": from the north, it bordered a frozen land, from the west, it connected to Bactria (Balkh), and to the south, it met the Indian Sea. This name and description indicate that the Alexander historians had little knowledge of the Eastern mountains of Kurdistan and Bakhtiari, as such a place, located along the route from Rakhj (modern-day Kandahar) to Balkh (near Mazar Sharif), doesn't exist.
The Alexander historians took Alexander from this land to Bactria (Balkh) and after conquering Bactria, they sent him to Sogdiana or Soderes. Because "Sogdiana" sounded similar to "Sogd," which was an ancient city between Samarkand and Bukhara, the Alexander historians identified the location as Sogd, but this is incorrect. Sogd was located more than 400 kilometers from Balkh, not along the route described by the historians.
In the history of ancient Iran, Moshir al-Dawlah wrote about Alexander's journey from Balkh to Sogdiana: Alexander and his army set out towards Sogdiana, entering the barren deserts of the country. Although they marched by night, the cry of "thirst" soon rose from the soldiers. They marched for miles without finding a river. The rays of the sun beat down on the hot sands, and the heat reflected back at them, making the situation unbearable. Even though a breeze blew in the early morning and the night brought some dew, by the time the sun rose, the dew evaporated... The soldiers of Alexander had lost their endurance and became hopeless, for they could not rest or continue... Instead of water, they were given wine and oil, which only weakened them. In their despair, two scouts who had gone ahead to find a camp for the army returned with water-filled flasks... After much hardship, they finally reached the "Amu" river and managed to cross it after ten days.

This is a complete fabrication of the Alexander historians because: The ancient city of Balkh is not Bactria, as described by the Alexander historians. Balkh is located six kilometers northwest of Mazar Sharif, beside the Balkh River, and 350 meters above sea level. The Balkh River is one of the tributaries of the "Amu River," and during the spring of 1967, its flood rate was recorded at 1752 cubic meters per second. The length of the Balkh River is around 350 kilometers, flowing past Balkh and into the Amu River. The valley of the Balkh River is rich in water, and there are many settlements along the river, such as Diwali, Khairabad, and Gharcheenk. The ancient city of "Termez" is located on the northern bank of the Amu River, opposite Balkh. This proves that: Bactria is not the ancient city of Balkh. The Oxus River, which the Alexander historians claimed originated in the Caucasus Mountains and flowed into the Caspian Sea, is not the Amu River either. The Amu River, as described by the poet Rudaki, is "like pearls beneath my feet in the sands of Amu." The ancient city of Sogd, which is located in the region of the present-day Uzbekistan between Samarkand and Bukhara, is not the Soderes of the Alexander historians either. The Alexander historians assigned many tasks to Alexander and his army on their journey through Sogd, including battles with the "Branchides" and the conquest of "Merkend." The historians even claim that they traveled 1500 "stadia" (roughly 92.5 kilometers per day) on their way to Merkend. They mistakenly identified Merkend as Samarkand, which is inaccurate, as Merkend is an ancient city in the region of Vararud (Transoxiana). They also report that Alexander conquered the city of "Cyrus" and reached the city of "Mamsan" where the inhabitants resisted bravely, but after defeating them, he moved towards Khujand (now Leninabad). Furthermore, the historians claim that before returning to Bactria, Alexander killed 120,000 Sogdian people during a rebellion. I wonder where they managed to find such a large number of people to kill. The Alexander historians then returned Alexander to Bactria (Balkh?) and sent him to India.
The Alexander historians mention that Alexander spent two years (from the spring of 327 to the spring of 325 BC) fighting in Western India (Punjab). Before moving towards India, Alexander ordered that all of his and his men's chariots filled with loot from the wars be burned. This is puzzling because it’s unclear how Alexander and his army carried chariots over mountainous terrain, across icy lands, and through vast deserts, especially when they crossed major rivers. These stories seem highly improbable and are not believable.
The Alexander historians also claim that Alexander traveled from "Nike" to India. Some historians mistakenly identify Nike as Kabul, but this is wrong. "Nike" is the name of the Greek goddess of victory, not a place. Kabul, on the other hand, is a natural name derived from the combination of the words for "mountain," "water," and "plenty" in ancient languages, and it was already used by the Aryans before Alexander's time.
Two thousand and seventy years after Alexander's mythical campaign to Kabul and then to India, in the winter of 1842, the brave people of this mountainous region utterly destroyed an army of 16,500 English and Hindu soldiers who were well-trained and equipped with modern weaponry. Only a few English soldiers and a handful of Hindus survived and made their way to Jalalabad. It would be fascinating if the Alexander historians could explain how Alexander and his army managed to pass through the ancestors of these brave people and reach India, given their lack of knowledge about the people and land of Afghanistan. Before analyzing Alexander's journey to India, I would like to point out that caravans from Iran to India traveled along four major routes.
The first was the route through Baluchistan, which passed through Western Baluchistan to Eastern Baluchistan and reached Multan, with a railway now constructed along this route. The second was the route through Sistan, following the Helmand River to Kandahar (ancient Rakhj) and from there, passing through the Blan Pass in the southern mountains of Afghanistan to reach Multan. The third route was from Sistan to Kandahar, Ghazni, Kabul, Jalalabad, the Khyber Pass, and Peshawar, which, after crossing the Indus River and Punjab, led to Lahore and Delhi.
Nader Shah, two thousand seventy years after Alexander, invaded India from this route. After preparing for war, he left Naderabad in Kandahar on the third day of the month of Safar, 1151 AH, and after conquering Ghazni, Kabul, and Jalalabad, he covered nearly 700 kilometers in 198 days (3.5 kilometers per day). On the 21st day of the month of Sha'ban, 1151 AH, he reached the Khyber Pass. After crossing the Khyber Pass, he marched towards Peshawar, Lahore, and the Karnaal plain, where he defeated the Indian army on the 9th of Dhu al-Qi'dah, 1151 AH. Nader Shah and his army covered nearly 1,700 kilometers from Kandahar to Delhi in 277 days (approximately 6 kilometers per day).
Comparing Nader Shah's progress with the rapid advances of Alexander's army is unfair because Nader's march took much longer, covering distances 15 times longer than those Alexander's army supposedly traveled. (92.5 kilometers per day on the way to Merkend). The fourth route was from Herat to Kabul, which followed the Herirud River to its sources and from there passed through Kabul and towards India.
Reading about the wars and victories of Alexander and his bloody conquests in India, as described by the Alexander historians, is tedious, akin to the exploits of Amir Arsalan Rumi. I will summarize these accounts here for you to judge for yourself. According to the Alexander historians, Alexander fought and defeated several rulers in India and either killed or made them his subjects.
Abissares, Omphis, Acuphis, Phegee, Aggrammes, Porus, Androcottus, Portican, Assacan, Oxycanus, Assacenus, Sisicottus, Camaxus, Sisicottus, Cleophas, Spithaces, Meroe, Sophites, Moeris, Taxile, Musicanus, Kandrames,
Alexander fought with these peoples in India and either crushed or subdued them:
Abestanes, Prestes, Sabraques, Peresiens, Sambastes, Pharraciens, Adraistes, Sabba, Adrestes, Sibae, Agalasse, Sibes, Arasaques, Sobiens, Aspiens, Sygambre, Candraides, Ambre, Massan, Thyreens, Ossadiens,
Alexander and his army crossed these rivers in India: ,
Acesines, Hydraostes, Alcesines, Hydaspes, Choaspe, Hyphasis, Choes, Hypanis, Cophes, Soastes, Guree,
Alexander and his army captured these lands and cities in India: ,
Andraque, Oxydraques, Aornos, Patala, Arigee, Hyala, Bazire, Cillute, Bezira, Cillustis, Catheens, Psiltucis, Glaucaniques, Patalabeus, Glauses, Pataliens, Gureens, Peucelatide, Harmatelia, Peuclaotis, Hiacense, Pimprama, Malliens, Sabus, Massagues, Sambus, Massaque, Sangala, Mazaga, Silee, Nicee, Sisique, Notaque, Sophites, Nysa, Nyse, Syndoramana,

Western historians believe that these names are ancient Iranian or Hindu.
Scholars from Iran and India believe that these are ancient Greek words.
My research concluded that these are neither Hindu, nor Iranian, nor Greek; ask Iranian, Hindu, and Greek linguists and judge for yourselves.
These names are fabrications of the Alexander narrative writers, who, in their quest to find these names among the ancient geographic names of Iran, Transoxiana (Central Asia), and Punjab, sought to turn the "Legend of Alexander" into historical events.
To further illustrate the historical value of the Alexander narratives, I present some excerpts from the accounts of Alexander’s invasion of India.

Alexander's army beheaded eighty thousand Hindus in the city of Sabus (or Sambus).
The Choaspes River was mistakenly identified by Alexander scholars as the Karkheh River.
Alexander and his army passed another river of the same name in India.
This is impossible unless there was another Karkheh River in India, and that region was part of the southern Khuzestan, since no such river exists in India. Therefore, the "India" that Alexander reached was actually the southern part of Khuzestan.

Acuphis was the oldest representative of the city of Nysa, which has been located between the Cophes and Indus Rivers.
It was written that the god Bacchus (the Greek version of "Bac") built this city.
I mentioned that "Bacchus" is the Greek version of "Bac," and the city of Nysa, which was the center of the Baganian cult during the Parthian period, is today's Nisa, near Ashkabad (Ashkabad).
This is also a sign of the ignorance of the Alexander narrative writers.
Cleophas (one might recall Cleopatra of Egypt) was at Assacan.

Patala, or Hitala, or … which was an island at the mouth of the Indus River, has been confused with the modern Indian city of Patiala.
Patiala is located southeast of Lahore and north of Delhi, more than 1,400 kilometers away from the mouth of the Indus River.
Alexander and his army departed from Nika (Kabul?!!!??) heading toward India.
The Alexander narratives state that from the spring of 327 to August 326 BC (almost a year and a half), they fought wars in India until they reached the mouth of the Indus River.
However, Strabo, a famous Greek geographer, states this period as 10 months (from October 327 to August 326 BC), while Plutarch, another ancient Greek historian, wrote seven months, indicating that these accounts are inconsistent, suggesting myth-making rather than historical accuracy.

Alexander scholars have mistaken the Tanais River for the Syr Darya River.
Just as the Oxus is not the Amu Darya, Tanais is not the Syr Darya, since Alexander did not pass through these regions.
Alexander told his army that if you ask about the end of the world, you should know that we are not far from the Ganges River and the eastern ocean, which connects to the Indian Ocean, the Caspian Sea, and the Persian Gulf, surrounding the entire world (History of Ancient Iran, page 1807).
This shows the limited knowledge of the Alexander narrative writers about the known world of their time.
The Alexander writers claim that the distance between the two arms of the Indus River at its mouth is 1,800 stadia, or 333 kilometers (longer than the distance from Tehran to Rasht). Can this be believed?!? Those who have seen the mouth of the Indus River say no.
Anyone who wants to know the truth should read the geography of Pakistan.
Since Alexander's soldiers had never seen tidal waters, when they arrived at the mouth of the Indus River and encountered high tide, they were frightened.
It is said that the Greeks were known for their naval expertise, so how could they not have known about the ebb and flow of the tides?
The Alexander writers mistook the Khur Musa for the mouth of the Indus River.
At the Shahpour Port (near Khur Musa), the difference between high and low tide has been measured at 1.60 meters.
Alexander mistook the "Aleses" River for the Nile, the great river of Egypt, and was told that the Hydaspes flows into Aleses, and both rivers drain into the Indus, eventually reaching the sea.
Alexander's military campaign in India ended once they reached the mouth of the Indus River.
They stayed in the city of Tapala until the spring of 325 BC, and then departed for Iran.
Since the Alexander narratives state that Alexander and his army arrived at the mouth of the Indus River in August 326 BC, they must have stayed there for at least seven months.

Alexander gathered the Indian representatives and told them: "What I have seized in India includes seven types of people and more than two thousand cities. I give it all to Porus."




 

The Return of Alexander and His Army from Distant Lands


In the Alexander narratives, it is written that Alexander took an omen: “Should I cross the Hephaestus river or not?” Since the omen didn’t turn out well, and moreover, one of his generals told him, “To India, which even the Indians are unaware of.” Where should we go? Going to India is worthy of your greatness and beyond our capabilities…” These words forced Alexander to give the “order to return.” In the Alexander narratives, it is written that in the early spring of 325 BC, Alexander divided his army into two columns, sending one by sea to the Persian Gulf, while he himself, with the other column, set off from "Patalene" by land towards the Araeus river. After nine days of marching, he encountered the people of Arabitis (or Arbites, Arbias).
After another nine days of travel, they reached the land of Gedrosians, and after five more days of travel, they arrived at the bank of the Arabus river (or Arabius). From here, dry and barren plains began, through which Alexander and his troops passed, encountering the people of Ortians (or Hortians, Oritides, or Oritae).
Here, Alexander divided his army into three columns: one to raid the coastline, another to invade the interior of the country, and the third to plunder the people who lived in the valley of Hazandegi. Alexander and his soldiers attacked the homes and livelihoods of the people, pillaging, killing, destroying, and burning everything in their path, to such an extent that the country was left in ruins. These actions are not true; rather, they reflect the bursting rage of the Greeks, who had long desired to do such things. Another Alexander chronicler wrote that after all this brutality, Alexander wanted to leave a legacy. Therefore, he built a "city of Alexander" there (Alexander scholars believe this is modern-day Karachi). After constructing this city, Alexander and his troops moved into the land of the Oritides, made them submit, and then headed towards the Gedrosians (which Alexander scholars identify as Balochistan). After seven days of traveling along the sea, they reached Pura, the capital of the Gedrosians (which Alexander scholars identify as Ferej). Alexander and his troops arrived at Pura sixty days after leaving Ores. According to all the Alexander chroniclers, the hardships they endured in these sixty days were minimal.
Plutarch wrote: Of the 120,000 foot soldiers and 15,000 cavalry that had traveled from India with Alexander, bad food, the sun's heat, contagious diseases, and above all hunger, killed three-quarters of them (more than 100,000 soldiers), leaving only a quarter alive.
With drunken revelry and enjoyment, Alexander and his soldiers moved from Pura towards "Carmania" (modern-day Kerman?). After seven days, they passed through Carmania and reached Persepolis (Shiraz?), and from there, they headed to Susa. When Alexander was in Carmania, a commander of a column from Alexander’s army, who had sailed from the city of Patalene towards the Persian Gulf by sea, came to report to Alexander in a coastal city named "Salmont" or "Salmus" (which scholars believe could refer to Bandar Abbas). He had passed through the lands of Arabitis, Ortians, and the fishermen (lower Gedrosians) to reach this city. Upon hearing his report, Alexander ordered him to continue his sea journey and proceed to Babylon via the Euphrates. It is also written that Alexander's soldiers found a plant in Gedrosia whose stem could easily cut through iron.
The Alexander chroniclers had little to no knowledge of the western part of India (modern-day Pakistan) and Balochistan. Alexander scholars knowingly feigned ignorance and tried to turn Alexander's myth into a historical event. What they wrote about his return from India via Balochistan is completely fabricated and inaccurate. This is because:
Alexander and his army, after leaving the mouth of the Indus River, clashed with the Arabitis people, passed through dry, waterless, and barren deserts, and encountered the "Ortians" people. They committed massacres, arson, murders, and plundering until Alexander reached a point where he wished to build the city of "Alexandria" (which Alexander scholars identify as Karachi). The city of Karachi is located at the delta of the Indus River, and today, three million people live there.
How can it be believed that Alexander and his army traveled from the mouth of the Indus River, marched for more than a month while fighting (one is reminded of a mill horse, which constantly moves in a circle)? Astonishingly, after building the city of Karachi, Alexander and his troops moved towards Balochistan, and after seven days of traveling along the sea, they reached Pura, the capital of Balochistan. Alexander scholars identify "Pura" as Ferej. Ferej is a large settlement on the way from Kerman to Zahedan. From Kerman, it is 270 kilometers, from Zahedan 250 kilometers, from Iranshahr 300 kilometers, and from the Strait of Hormuz (along the sea) 450 kilometers away. How is it that Alexander scholars have placed such a location near the sea?
The Alexander narratives claim that Alexander and his army, after leaving Ores and enduring sixty days of military progress, reached Pura (Ferej as identified by Alexander scholars), the capital of the Gedrosians (Balochistan as identified by Alexander scholars). This could never have happened. This is because Alexander’s army had dug a trench around the city of Ores and took it, then proceeded to the Aoraos mountain and from there set off towards the Indus River. With this indication, the location of Ores is more than a thousand kilometers from the mouth of the Indus. The shortest route from the mouth of the Indus by the sea to the Gwadar Gulf, then to Sibar, Iranshahr, Buzman, and Ferej, is over 1400 kilometers. Thus, Alexander and his army would have traveled at least 2400 kilometers from Ores to the mouth of the Indus and then to Pura.
If we take into account the military advance of Nader Shah in the India campaign (around six kilometers per day) which had been planned for years in advance and, moreover, the climatic conditions and battlefields in which Nader Shah’s army was familiar, then based on that scale, Alexander’s army would have needed 400 days to travel this 2400 kilometers, not the sixty days as written by the Alexander chroniclers. Alexander and his army must have spent at least seven months at the mouth of the Indus River until spring arrived (from August 326 to spring 325 BC). Therefore, in total, they would have taken twenty months or 600 days to travel from Ores to Pura. How could they have done this in just two months and sixty days (one-tenth of the twenty months estimated above)? Only God knows, and it is utterly unbelievable.
When Alexander and his army were in Carmania, in a coastal city named Salmus (possibly Bandar Abbas according to scholars), they held a theater performance for the soldiers, and the Macedonians gathered there. Suddenly, they received a message that the ships Alexander had sent from the mouth of the Indus River to scout the Persian Gulf had arrived at the location.
This is another impossible and unbelievable feat. The Strait of Hormuz is 450 kilometers from Ferej, 500 kilometers from Kerman (Gavashir before), 300 kilometers from Baft or Sirjan, and 250 kilometers from Jiroft. How could Alexander and his army have been in one place and simultaneously been in the Strait of Hormuz, by the sea? Perhaps they had doppelgangers assisting them in this campaign. It would have been helpful to hear an explanation from the Alexander scholars.
Alexander and his army supposedly made a seven-day journey from Carmania (Kerman?) to Pasargadae and from there to Persepolis. This too is impossible to believe, because the distance from Kerman to Rafsanjan, from there to the city of Babak, Herat, Khoreh, Khansar, and Pasargadae is over 500 kilometers, from Ferej to Bam, to Saroodieh, to Rahbar, to Baft, to Sirjan, to Babak, and to Pasargadae is over 700 kilometers, and from Bandar Abbas to Kahgam, Darab, Fasa, Khormeh, Persepolis, and Pasargadae is over 600 kilometers. If Alexander and his troops had taken the shortest route, they would have had to march more than seventy kilometers per day to have reached Pasargadae from Kerman in seven days. This kind of journey was impossible at the time. Just like most of Alexander's feats, it was a product of the imagination of the Alexander chroniclers. They have placed him in early spring 325 BC in Patalene at the mouth of the Indus River, traveling to Balochistan, Kerman, Pasargadae, and Persepolis, and in the same year, from Persepolis to Susa. This too is impossible, as the distance from the mouth of the Indus River to Gwadar, Sibar, Iranshahr, Buzman, Ferej, Bam, Kerman, Rafsanjan, Babak, Herat, Khoreh, Khansar, and Pasargadae is over 2800 kilometers.
If we consider the progress of Alexander and his army, taking into account all the wars, suffering, intoxication, and the drunkenness of his troops, similar to the progress of Nader Shah's army in the India campaign (6 kilometers per day), then after sixteen months, and if we assume that Alexander’s army advanced twice as fast as Nader Shah's, they would have reached Pasargadae after eight months (from April to December, 325 BC).
December marks the beginning of winter, and since heavy snow covers the slopes of Mount Dena during winter, Alexander and his army could not have passed through it, nor could they have traveled the 700 kilometers between Persepolis and Susa in winter, reaching Susa in the same year, 325 BC.
Again, I write that if Alexander and his army had traveled the 3500 kilometers from the mouth of the Indus River to Balochistan, to Kerman, to Fars, and to Susa continuously without stopping, it still cannot be accepted that they could have covered this distance in 9 months (excluding the three months of winter). Alexander’s biographers have woven these events together to create a timeline that would allow him to accomplish other great deeds. In order to keep Alexander busy and obtain new victories for him, they sent him to "Media," and from there to Sambana (Sumbana), and then to Bagistan and Nisa. They kept him in Nisa for thirty days and then took him to Ekbatana in seven days.
Alexander scholars have mistakenly identified Sambana with Cambadene, and Cambadene with Kermanshah, both of which are incorrect. This is because Sambana bears no resemblance to Cambadene, and the ancient name of Kermanshah was "Khurmithan" = "Khormihan" = "Land of the Sun," which in Arabic is "Qarmasin."
The name "Bistun" was originally "Bistan" (B + Y = God + Stan = Column), which today is simply called Bistun (without the column). Alexander’s biographers once depicted Nisa as being located between Kabul and the Indus River, near a river with swift waters, unless this Nisa is a different one. The only major ancient site between Bistun and Hamadan is Kangavar, where the temple of Ana Hita (the virgin goddess of water) was constructed. The ancient name of this place is Kangavar, and it cannot be accepted that, in Alexander’s time, it was called "Nisa." I do not believe that Hamadan was the same as Ekbatana of Alexander’s biographers, since the name Hamadan comes from "Ham + Amadan," meaning "all knowledge" or "abundant flow," referring to the flow of water.
One of the significant achievements that Alexander’s biographers fabricated for him in Media was his war against the Cosseans (Kassi), and his victory over them.
Who were the Cosseans? The Elamites called them "Kasi," the Assyrians called them "Kasu," Herodotus referred to them as "Kysi," and the Greeks called them "Kasaai." In history, they are also referred to as "Kasii," "Kasu," "Kasi," "Kassi," and "Kassiites." First, we must understand who these people were, and then examine Alexander's war with them.
In the third millennium BC, or perhaps earlier, before the migration of the Hurrians and Mittanians to Asia Minor, a group of fair-skinned people with violet eyes and blonde hair, coming from the northern Caucasus, passed through the Talysh Mountains and settled in Iran, specifically in the White River valley and its delta (today’s Gilan). These people were the "Gasp" (or Caspian), who established a brilliant and expansive civilization here and named the Caspian Sea after themselves. The underground artifacts found in the White River valley, stretching from the Caspian Sea to the northern mountains of Zanjan, from Amalesh to Talysh, were once part of the Gasp civilization.
The Gasp were followers of the Mithraic religion and were likely the first to domesticate horses in Iran. The Gasp of Gilan, with their violet eyes, fair skin, and blonde hair, predominantly live in Fuman, Asalem, and Talysh, and are descendants of the Gasp.
The Gasp moved from the Talysh Mountains to Azerbaijan as well. The people of Azerbaijan, with violet eyes, fair skin, and blonde hair, are also of Gasp descent and related to the Gasp people of Gilan. The Gasp migrated to the Iranian plateau, and the city of Qazvin, which became known as "Kaspi" (derived from "Caspian"), was their stronghold for a long time. The Mobeds and the fair-skinned, violet-eyed people of Qazvin are also of Gasp descent.
Some of the Gasp people also migrated to Khorasan, where they settled in the Casp River valley, which today is known as Khashf Rud (Khashf means "turtle" in Persian, and in the Shahnameh, this river is referred to as "Kasf Rud" or "Casp Rud"). From Qazvin, the Gasp moved to Hamadan and then to Lorestan, where they settled in the mountain ranges. Through breeding horses and selling them to the Babylonians, they reached Babylon. Before the Gasp sold horses to the Babylonians, the Sumerians, Akkadians, and Babylonians used oxen to pull their chariots. After discovering the horse, they began to use them to pull their chariots, which they purchased from the Gasp.
Even today, in Lorestan, fair-skinned people with blonde hair and violet eyes live in the Nireh areas of Kakavand, Hasnavand, the natives of Nourabad, and in the regions of Zagheh, Alishtar, Delfan, Selseleh, Kermanshah, and other places, who are descendants of the Gasp people.
The Gasp of Lorestan, who had entered Babylon through horse trading, gradually infiltrated Babylon and began to seize power. These incursions grew so much that, by the 18th century BC, the name of the Gasp appeared in Babylonian history.
The Gasp, who had grown stronger over time, took control of Babylon in 1520 BC and established their rule there. During their rule over Babylon, the Gasp constantly fought with the Assyrians, who were the northwest neighbors of Babylon. The Gasp quickly assimilated into Babylonian civilization, expanded Babylonian trade, and established trade relations with countries like Elam and Egypt. Among the famous Gasp kings in Babylon were Karaindash (around 1380 BC), Burnaburiash II (around 1350 BC), and Melishichu (around 1180 BC).
The Gasp taught the Babylonians how to breed horses, and from there, horses were introduced to Arabia, leading to the prominence of Arabian horses worldwide today.
In 1160 BC, after 360 years of rule over Babylon, the Gasp were defeated by the Elamites, and their reign in Babylon ended. They retreated to the mountains of Lorestan. The biographers of Alexander invented impossible deeds for him, one of which was the supposed defeat and subjugation of the Gasp by Alexander in Lorestan. Because these biographers had no knowledge of the distant past of the East or its history, and they were only vaguely aware of the Gasp’s reputation as brave and powerful people, they wanted to claim that Alexander had defeated them, so no other force would remain on Earth that had not been conquered by Alexander. The Alexander biographers did not know, nor did they want to investigate, that from the fall of the Gasp monarchy in Babylon in 1160 BC until 324 BC, when they supposedly had Alexander defeat the Gasp, 836 years had passed, and the Gasp as a force no longer existed. Thus, the Alexander biographers were "flogging the dead Gasp."
The Alexander biographers have written that in 324 BC, Alexander was sent from Media to Babylon, where he died of a fever in the hot lands of the East on June 10, 323 BC at the age of 33.